Cazul Corneliu Barsan   februarie 26th, 2013

Un specialist de prima marca. Roman. Magistrat la Curtea Europeana a Drepturilor Omului. Casatorit. Sotia, si ea magistrat. La Inalta Curte. Ambele posturi fiind vizate de clientela PDL. Si asa se produce marea facatura. In care Corneliu Barsan este interceptat, in baza Legii sigurantei nationale, sub pretextul ca ar fi terorist.

Cum de a fost posibil asa ceva? Cum s-a procedat, de fapt? Cine au fost initiatorii? Ce au urmarit ei? Este acesta un caz singular? Sau este pur si simplu una dintre nenumaratele piese puse pe banda rulanta a faradelegilor DNA, in complicitate cu reprezentanti ai altor institutii ale statului?

Intrucat si functia sotului si functia sotiei sunt extraordinar de importante in arhitectura justitiei, el judecand nenumarate cauze la CEDO, care vizeaza nedreptati suferite de romani, prin nerespectarea unor proceduri de drept civil sau de drept penal, iar ea, prin pozitia de la Inalta Curte, fiind punctul terminus al unor procese de condamnare sau de achitare, artizanii acestei operatiuni de supraveghere si inregistrare ilegala a lui Barsan si-au asumat, incontestabil, un important risc. Cum putea fi interceptat, in scopul de a fi obtinute, eventual, informatii compromitatoare, acest judecator la CEDO, fara ca procedura in sine sa starneasca reactii? Pentru ca, in definitiv, un judecator, fie el si sub epoleti, trebuie sa se pronunte. Trebuie sa-si dea girul. Sa semneze mandatul de interceptare. Si de aici ar fi putut fi generate discutii. Si controverse. Care i-ar fi incomodat sau chiar demascat pe initiatori.

Asa se face ca, la limita, s-a recurs la solutia extrema. Mai poate fi obtinut, aproape automat si in conditiile pastrarii unui secret desavarsit, un mandat de interceptare si pe alta cale. Declari persoana respectiva suspecta de terorism. Si o urmaresti si o interceptezi cat vrei. Astfel, magistratul Corneliu Barsan a devenit o victima a regimului Traian Basescu.

Pana la urma, vor fi aflate toate detaliile necesare privind modul in care a fost pusa la cale aceasta operatiune. Precum si cele referitoare la promotori. Pana la urma, se va afla cine a facut presiuni pentru a se obtine o aprobare in acest sens si cine, procedand la fel de ilegal, a aprobat faradelegea. Vom sti, la capatul firului, cu certitudine, si care a fost scopul urmarit. Probabil, cel pe care l-am sugerat deja. Ca alti doi magistrati, loiali lui Basescu, sa le ia locul sotilor Barsan. Dar problema problemelor este fenomenul ca atare.

Nu este nici prima si, din nefericire, nici ultima data cand este utilizat acest mecanism. Oameni care nu au nimic de-a face cu terorismul, uneori personalitati publice, pentru a fi supravegheati, urmariti si inregistrati, sunt inclusi in mod artificial si, as spune, criminal in aceasta categorie. Iar rezultatul este nu numai ca se incalca legea. Nu numai ca oameni nevinovati sunt expusi unei grave banuieli, ci pur si simplu, sub aceasta umbrela a luptei impotriva terorismului, personalitati ale vietii publice sunt scoase din circulatie.

Amploarea acestui fenomen si modul in care el poate fi curmat ar trebui sa fie, pentru noi toti, o mare preocupare.

Sursa: CorectNews

Atat comentariile, cat si ping-urile sunt inchise.

11 comentarii

februarie 27th, 2013 at 12:12
Marian Nicolae spune:

Se pare ca n-are rost sa faci pe nebunul deoarece planeta se poate invarti si fara mine….asa ca, in acest context de idei, haideti sa trecem in revista sefii de misiuni diplomatice americane la Bucuresti, incepand cu anul 1880………………..

Chiefs of Mission for Romania

http://history.state.gov/departmenthistory/people/chiefsofmission/romania

• Eugene Schuyler (1880-)
• Eugene Schuyler (1880-)
• Eugene Schuyler (1882-1884)
• John Walker Fearn (1885-1899)
• Archibald Loudon Snowden (1889-)
• Archibald Loudon Snowden (1891-)
• Truxtun Beale (1892-)
• Truxtun Beale (1892-)
• Truxtun Beale (1893-)
• Eben Alexander (1893-1897)
• William Woodville Rockhill (1897-)
• William Woodville Rockhill (1898-1899)
• Arthur Sherburne Hardy (1899-1901)
• Charles Spencer Francis (1900-1902)
• Henry Lane Wilson (1902-)
• John Brinkerhoff Jackson (1902-)
• John Brinkerhoff Jackson (1903-1905)
• John Wallace Riddle (1905-1907)
• Horace Greeley Knowles (1907-)
• Horace Greeley Knowles (1907-1909)
• Huntington (Francis Mairs Huntington-Wilson) Wilson (1908-)
• Spencer Fayette Eddy (1909-1909)
• John Ridgely Carter (1909-)
• John Ridgely Carter (1910-1911)
• John Brinkerhoff Jackson (1911-1913)
• Charles Joseph Vopicka (1913-1920)
• Peter Augustus Jay (1921-1925)
• William Smith Culbertson (1925-1928)
• Charles Stetson Wilson (1928-1933)
• Leland Harrison (1935-1937)
• Franklin Mott Gunther (1937-)
———————————————–
Atentie de aici in jos, va rog:
______________________________
• Rudolf Emil Schoenfeld (1947-) – – – – – – -(!!!!!!)
• James Watson Gantenbein (1950-1952) – (!!!!!)
• Harold Shantz (1952-1955) – – – – – – – – – – (!!!!)
• Robert Helyer Thayer (1955-1957)
• Clifton Reginald Wharton (1958-1960)
• William Avery Crawford (1961-)
• John Putnam Shaw (1964-)
• William Avery Crawford (1964-1965)
• Richard Hallock Davis (1965-1969)
• Leonard Carpenter Meeker (1969-1973)
• Harry George Barnes (1973-1977)
• Orison Rudolph Aggrey (1977-1981)
• David B. Funderburk (1981-1985) – – – – —–(!!!!)
• Roger Kirk (1985-1989)
• Alan Green (1989-1992)
• John Roger Davis (1991-1994)
• Alfred H. Moses (1994-1997)———————(!!!!)
• James Carew Rosapepe (1997-2001)
• Michael E. Guest (2001-2004)
• Jack Dyer Crouch (2004-2005)
• Nicholas F. Taubman (2005-2008)—————(!!)
• Mark Gitenstein (2009-)—————————-(!!!)

————————————————————-

nota Roninjaune:

Doresc sa va atrag atentia, ca sefii de misiuni diplomatice americane, incepand cu anul de gratie 1947, incep sa fie cu obstinatie EVREI, doi, trei unul dupa celalalt sau intercalati cu ambasadori americani goymi…

februarie 27th, 2013 at 12:13
Marian Nicolae spune:

Benjamin Franklin

(This prophecy, by Benjamin Franklin, was made in a “CHIT CHAT AROUND THE TABLE DURING INTERMISSION,” at the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention of 1787.

This statement was recorded in the dairy of Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, a delegate from South Carolina.)

http://www.radioislam.org/islam/english/toread/frnklin.htm

“I fully agree with General Washington, that we must protect this young nation from an insidious influence and impenetration.

The menace, gentlemen, is the Jews.

In whatever country Jews have settled in any great number, they have lowered its moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is founded, by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a state within the state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that country to death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal.

For over 1,700 years, the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate in that they have been exiled from their homeland, as they call Palestine. But gentlemen, did the world give it to them in fee simple, they would at once find some reason for not returning. Why? Because they are vampires, and vampires do not live on vampires. They cannot live only among themselves.

They must subsist on Christians and other people not of their race.

If you do not exclude them from these United States, in their Constitution, in less than 200 years they will have swarmed here in such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land and change our form of government, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives our substance and jeopardized our liberty.

If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves.

Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they will nor how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American’s, and will not even thou they live among us ten generations. A leopard cannot change its spots.

Jews are Asiatics, are a menace to this country if permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitutional Convention.”

– Benjamin Franklin

februarie 27th, 2013 at 12:18
Marian Nicolae spune:

“THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION”

http://www.radioislam.org/islam/english/toread/frnklin.htm

7.1. The intensification of armaments, the increase of police forces – are all essential… there should be in all the States of the world, besides ourselves, only the masses of the proletariat, a few millionaires devoted to our interests, police and soldiers.
7.2. Throughout Europe… we must create ferments, discords and hostility… we must use great cunning… during negotiations… we shall keep… the mask of honesty… In this way… the Goyim… will still continue to accept us as the… saviours…
7.5. We must compel the governments of the GOYIM to take action in the direction favored by our widely conceived plan… by what we shall represent as public opinion, secretly promoted by us through the means… of the press, which, with a few exceptions that may be disregarded, is already entirely in our hands.

februarie 27th, 2013 at 12:20
Marian Nicolae spune:

– Palestinians won’t get their independence until Americans get theirs!

Ariel Sharon:
“We control America”

http://www.radioislam.org/islam/english/toread/clinjew.htm

“Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”
– Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001.

“Israel controls the United States Senate.”
– Sen. William Fulbright

februarie 27th, 2013 at 12:23
Marian Nicolae spune:

The Jewish U.S. Ambassadors

22/04/1998

The Jewish U.S. Ambassadors mentioned here have been chosen not because of their ethnical origin, but because of their political ideology and POLITICAL position regarding the Palestine question, as POLITICAL actors.

They are mentioned not because they are Jews, but they are mentioned because we believe that the Jewish lobby in the US has created a dangerous concentration of power which we believe is troublesome to the democracy of that country and dangerous for the peace in the Middle East.

It is a political analysis which has been made by many observers, including Israeli newspapers.

Just the fact that the Jews don’t agree with our political views should not allow them to deprive us of our human right of freedom of speech.

The tragic reality is this; freedom of speech is almost non-existent in many European countries.

We hope that censorship will not prevail over the content of our or any other homepages.

It is the situation in the Middle East that is very much inflamed – the parties concerned in the debate and the conflict only reflect the real polarization.

To the Palestinians and Muslims the Zionists appear to be the Nazis of today.

To the victims of Zionism this ideology is not experienced as something positive, but rather as a symbol of evil.

This Jewish concentration of power in USA gives World Jewry tremendous influence to promote their „special agenda”. Never before in American history have so many Jews been appointed as US Ambassadors. They are all members of powerful Jewish organizations.

These are hardened supporters of Israel and the „Jewish race”. It is impossible for them to put the interests of America ahead of their Zionist state. None would hold these ambassadorships unless they were members of the ruling Jewish elite.

februarie 27th, 2013 at 12:27
Marian Nicolae spune:

Le Judaïsme est nu!

NOTES SUR L’OUVRAGE D’ISRAEL SHAHAK “JEWISH HISTORY, JEWISH RELIGION”

http://www.radioislam.org/islam/french/debat/shah.htm

Histoire juive-Religion Juive

L’édition originale de l’ouvrage d’Israel Shahak a paru aux éditions “Pluto Press”, Londres, 1994. Sa traduction française a paru aux éditions “La Vieille Taupe”, Paris, 1996. Ces notes se référent à l´édition originale anglaise.

Israël SHAHAK est un des nombreux “rescapés” de l’”Holocauste”. Né à Varsovie en 1933, il passe son enfance au camp de Bergen-Belsen. En 1945, il émigre en Israël et sert dans l´armée juive Tsahal. Militant des droits de l’homme, il collabore au journal “Haaretz” et s’attaque à l’obscurantisme religieux juif et à son influence dans la vie politique de l´État colonial d´Israël. Juif et “israëlien”, il est donc ethniquement irréprochable et politiquement correct.

Tout commence en 1965, lorsque SHAHAK est témoin d’un incident qui le marquera profondément. Dans un quartier de Jérusalem un non-juif (goy) s’effondre brusquement, victime semble-t-il d’une crise cardiaque. Prié de mettre son téléphone à disposition pour appeler une ambulance, un juif religieux refuse, en invoquant la Halakha qui lui interdit de sauver un non-juif le jour du Sabbat. Shahak interroge peu après les membres de la Cour rabbinique de Jérusalem ; ces membres sont nommés par l’Etat d’Israël. Ceux-ci répondent que la personne qui a refusé l’usage de son téléphone a agi conformément aux lois religieuses et ils se réfèrent à l’abrégé des lois talmudiques. Finalement les autorités rabbiniques tant en Israël que dans la diaspora n’ont jamais fait machine arrière et ont toujours refusé de modifier ou de supprimer la moindre prescription sabbatique. Il est donc interdit à un juif de profaner le jour du Sabbat pour sauver un non-juif. Par contre la violation du Sabbat est permise pour sauver un juif. Dérouté et scandalisé par cette discrimination raciste, Shahak se met à étudier les lois talmudiques. Il nous livre le fruit de trente ans de recherches et d’un demi-siècle de vie dans la Terre promise.

februarie 27th, 2013 at 12:53
Marian Nicolae spune:

Some Teachings of the Jewish Talmud

http://www.radioislam.org/islam/english/toread/talmud2.htm

Where a Jew Should Do Evil

Moed Kattan 17a: If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.

Penalty for Disobeying Rabbis

Erubin 21b. Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell.

Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God

Sanhedrin 58b. If a heathen (gentile) hits a Jew, the gentile must be killed.

O.K. to Cheat Non-Jews

Sanhedrin 57a . A Jew need not pay a gentile (“Cuthean”) the wages owed him for work.

Jews Have Superior Legal Status

Baba Kamma 37b. “If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability; but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite…the payment is to be in full.”

Jews May Steal from Non-Jews

Baba Mezia 24a . If a Jew finds an object lost by a gentile (“heathen”) it does not have to be returned. (Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b). Sanhedrin 76a. God will not spare a Jew who “marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a Cuthean…”

Jews May Rob and Kill Non-Jews

Sanhedrin 57a . When a Jew murders a gentile (“Cuthean”), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.

Baba Kamma 37b. The gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has “exposed their money to Israel.”

Jews May Lie to Non-Jews

Baba Kamma 113a. Jews may use lies (“subterfuges”) to circumvent a Gentile.

februarie 27th, 2013 at 12:59
rancea gheorghe spune:

Desigur ca regret ca statul roman este in deriva. Insa, in acelasi timp, oricat as fi eu de vocal, vocea mea nu are vreo insemnatate.
Eu sper ca atacul structurilor politiei politice asupra institutiilor reale ale justitiei va determina in ultima instanta intrarea in normalitate. Eu nu stiu care anume este normalitatea; ori se impune politia politica si ajungem la un fel de fascism, desigur in conditii de legalitate „perfecta”, ori castiga justitia impotriva „reprezentantilor statului”. Amandoua versiunile vor avea pagube insemnate.

februarie 27th, 2013 at 13:11
Marian Nicolae spune:

Genocide Advocated by the Talmud

http://www.radioislam.org/islam/english/toread/talmud2.htm

Minor Tractates. Soferim 15, Rule 10. This is the saying of Rabbi Simon ben Yohai: Tob shebe goyyim harog („Even the best of the gentiles should all be killed”).

This passage is from the original Hebrew of the Babylonian Talmud as quoted by the 1907 Jewish Encyclopedia, published by Funk and Wagnalls and compiled by Isidore Singer, under the entry, „Gentile,” (p. 617).

This original Talmud passage has been concealed in translation. The Jewish Encyclopedia states that, „…in the various versions the reading has been altered, ‘The best among the Egyptians’ being generally substituted.” In the Soncino version: „the best of the heathens” (Minor Tractates, Soferim 41a-b].

Israelis annually take part in a national pilgrimage to the grave of Simon ben Yohai, to honor this rabbi who advocated the extermination of non-Jews. (Jewish Press, June 9, 1989, p. 56B).

On Purim, Feb. 25, 1994, Israeli army officer Baruch Goldstein, an orthodox Jew from Brooklyn, massacred 40 Palestinian civilians, including children, while they knelt in prayer in a mosque. Goldstein was a disciple of the late Brooklyn Rabbi Meir Kahane, who told CBS News that his teaching that Arabs are „dogs” is derived „from the Talmud.” (CBS 60 Minutes, „Kahane”).

University of Jerusalem Prof. Ehud Sprinzak described Kahane and Goldstein’s philosophy: „They believe it’s God’s will that they commit violence against goyim, a Hebrew term for non-Jews.” (NY Daily News, Feb. 26, 1994, p. 5).

Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg declared, „We have to recognize that Jewish blood and the blood of a goy are not the same thing.” (NY Times, June 6, 1989, p.5).

Rabbi Yaacov Perrin said, „One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” (NY Daily News, Feb. 28, 1994, p.6).

februarie 27th, 2013 at 13:13
Marian Nicolae spune:

Februarie 27th, 2013 at 12:59
@ rancea gheorghe

Atata timp cat Romania este condusa catre gropapa, de catre evreii kazari, asa cum au fost Rusia, Spania, Portugalia, Polonia, Germania in istorie, ne vom duce la vale grav ( deja ne-am dus).

Singura solutie este expulzarea TUTUROR evreilor din Romania.

martie 2nd, 2013 at 16:28
rancea gheorghe spune:

Sistemul de stat al procurorilor, este in structura Ministerului Justitiei, insa procurorii au fost numiti de presedintele Romaniei.
Eu nu inteleg cine conduce acest sistem insa inteleg ca nu asculta nimeni de ministrul justitiei; se spune ca nici presedintele nu se interpune in problematica acestui siste. Asa ca, sistemul nu este condus; cheltuieste resurse din bugetul statului, nu are responsabilitati si lucreaza pentru sine si pe cont propriu.